« Encouraging American Christians To Reconsider Their Convictions | Main | The Image of Protestant Evangelical Worship, pt 3 »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c3d8353ef00d83459062669e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Image of Protestant Evangelical Worship, pt 2:
» More on worship from ICTHUS
Chris Monroe is unrelenting! Where does he get these photos? The Image of Protestant Evangelical Worship, pt 2 The following photo, for many folks, best represents the heart of what protestant evangelical worship is all about: What do you find affirmin... [Read More]
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Colleen Carroll: The New Faithful: Why Young Adults Are Embracing Christian Orthodoxy
Mark Galli: Beyond Smells & Bells: The Wonder and Power of Christian Liturgy
Sarah Cunningham: Dear Church: Letters from a Disillusioned Generation
Shane Claiborne: The Irresistible Revolution: Living as an Ordinary Radical
Mark Galli: Jesus Mean and Wild: The Unexpected Love of an Untamable God
Mark Yaconelli: Contemplative Youth Ministry : Practicing the Presence of Jesus
I was reading this morning in Luke 12 where Jesus says "Be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees, which is sheer pretense." He is speaking in that part of Luke about the importance of a faith that is the same on the inside as what we display on the outside.
This photo illustrates the performance side of modern worship. I can't say whether the young women in the photo are sincerely worshipping God, or merely acting the part for the audience. But knowing my own human weaknesses and how easy it is for me to put on a show instead of the real thing, I fear that we are teaching people that worship is form and not substance, appearance and not heart. That's a very dangerous error.
Posted by: Charlie | May 17, 2005 at 06:57 AM
Thanks, Charlie ... well said.. That was my own initial reaction based on personal experience, both as an observer and as a "performer."
Posted by: Rev. Mike | May 17, 2005 at 07:04 AM
I'm not sure it's for us to make a judgment call about what is going on in the hearts of other people or how the Spirit is moving. If we were able to do nothing more than view the publican and the pharisee praying in the temple, it would be impossible for us to know which one Jesus praised for his faithfulness. The attitude of he heart is what Jesus praised and a picture cannot reveal this.
I just wrote this on another blog about another topic but I think it applies here:
Fred Rogers (of "Mister Rogers' Neighborhood" fame) was in seminary when he and some friends decided to drive a long way to hear a highly regarded pastor preach. But on arriving at the church, they found he had taken a vacation and a sub would be preaching.
This would be bad enough, but to Rogers the sub was unbearable, preaching a bland message in a monotone. Rogers was so angry at driving so far for banalities that he was going to make a snide remark to the friend sitting next to him only to find her in tears. She confessed that the message was exactly what she needed to hear.
It was at that point that Rogers decided that it was never possible for him to fully know if a message was truly without worth. This was galvanized over the years when he would get a letter from a viewer telling how one episode of Rogers's show had touched his/her heart in a special way. Often, the writer would relate something that was said during the episode, but when Rogers attempted to corroborate what was said in the script of that episode against what the viewer thought was said, more often than not there was no match. Rogers concluded that the Holy Spirit said what He wanted to say to that person through the show, even if it was not said explicitly.
In other words, sometimes you just don't know how the Spirit is working.
Posted by: DLE | May 17, 2005 at 07:25 AM
I like that they are modestly dressed and that their eyes are closed. They do not seem to be focusing on the "audience." Our own worship leader often leads with his eyes closed and knowing his heart, I know it is not a performance. I have seen some women on a worship platform that were definately not modestly dressed. It distracted me, a woman, I can only imagine and cringe at how their attire may have distracted the men in the congregation.
I see in this picture a sense of reverence and that is often missing in the upbeat, "Spirit filled" worship that is so popular these days. But I agree, sometimes you just don't know how the Spirit is working.
Posted by: Maryellen | May 17, 2005 at 07:39 AM
I have a problem, not just with this picture, but with the modern, western idea of limiting worship to just music, singing and praise celebrations. It's the symptom of a much larger issue we have, I believe.
Posted by: Benjy | May 17, 2005 at 08:29 AM
Hay guys it is the old pagan again.
Affirming or disturbing ??!
Evangelicals are a branch off of the vine of The Reformation. Although Protestant Christianity prides itself (for the most part) with their separation from Rome and Her trappings this separation inflected a blindness upon Protestants.
We rightly distance ourselves from such acts of worship and prayer that exchange Yahweh’s glory for creation’s glory. However this created a relationship between us and our God that does not reflect the wholeness of ourselves given over to Him.
Where am I going here? This subject is overwhelming so I will try to confine it to worshiping with our whole body and that to the fullness of our senses; sight, taste, hearing, smell, and touch I think that is right.
This picture depicts interesting icon focuses. Fire in the background Holy Spirit. A cross in the foreground,our sacrifice, with roses Jesus, and a towel alongside His servanthood. The women are prostrate the position of any servant before their King.
Practicing Eastern worship forms and Occult activities that I interrupt as worship but to the Demons instead of the true God - Yahweh; Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit I used all five of the interactive aspects that make up the fullness of my ability to understand and respond from that understanding. The Temple both on Earth and seen by John in Heaven filled the worshipper with the overwhelming presence of Yahweh. There before ones eyes could be seen depictions of the nature of the Trinity the Showbread - Jesus the Bread of life, the candle sticks representing the flame of the Holy Spirit and the Father’s protection as the pillar of fire in the wilderness. There is the Great Sea where the Priests washed themselves before presenting the lamb of sacrifice - representing the Lamb of Yahweh,both aspects of Jesus as Lamb and Priest, space limits carrying on. Read the sections in Lev.1-6 and 23-24 and the worship scenes in Rev. and Ezk. Notice sights, sounds, smells, actions, works of art representing aspects of the Godhead. Much of the reaction stemming out of the Reformation handicapped us as worshipers. How often do we use our legs. Are we in danger of being called out like David for expressing his joy over the returning of the Ark.
Those of you who are daring find a Tazae (not sure of the spelling) service near you go to a Mass, go to a Synagogue experience interaction on different levels of your whole body. This is part of the exploration I had to struggle through upon becoming a “Christian” in the western setting.
Unity - restoration - reformation - transformation; from what to what remember what the prefix “RE” means?! Maybe we as worshipers could open our eyes if we had something to meditate upon that depicted an aspect of the nature of Yahweh instead of having to shut off a part of who we are?
What is in the picture look again do you see depictions of Christ?
Pastor Art
Posted by: Pastor Art | May 17, 2005 at 09:23 AM
I feel mixed about this picture.
I feel somewhat distrubed because it seems as if their interaction with God is totally on an individual bases. Their eyes are closed, they are not facing each other, they have their own mics. And yet I used to be this way and still know others that show their emotions through worship in this way. Its as if they want to touch God and feel him all around, yet isn't he all around in the people we are around? I remember the first time I was singing in a group and we all turned to face each other, eyes open. At first it was weird, but yet there seemed to be a connectedness there in each other as we sang. I can't say if these ladies are "putting on a show" or not. I hope they aren't. I just know that we have somewhat lost the communality idea of the gospel and replaced it with our individualistic tones.
Posted by: clark | May 17, 2005 at 11:30 AM
As a musician, playing with different tribes, I've come to experience a variety of methods of worship. Yes, we somehow get wrapped up in the "packaging/presentation" of worship; what it looks like, what is sounds like. I like my friend Benjy's comment in that music is the medium used for worship. Probably because music is found throughout the bible.
I was playing at a Third Day worship celebration and there was some talk of even putting the band/worship team in another room and piping it into the congregation. As silly as it seems, the thought may force one to find another way to "get in" instead of relying on the performance of the band; what I call "worshipping the worship". Being a musician, the best worship times I have are with some beginner guitar player who knows 3 chords, leading some songs. This way I am not distracted by the musicianship of the band.
Try visiting a Church of Christ. No instruments. Hee hee.
Posted by: Matt | May 17, 2005 at 12:03 PM
I think the first part of Romans 12, sums up what worship is. So what I do find disturbing is...how an image might stir us enough to pass judgement. I can not see through the picture into the hearts and lives of these young ladies. So, I'll leave any voice to the one who can.
I believe things are changing in the postmodern church...from worship being seen as stage act, to worship being an act of everyday life. I pray his Spirit will move us deeper into that reality.
Posted by: ron | May 17, 2005 at 02:14 PM
I think that a photo is not a fair way to judge a worship service or the hearts of the worshippers. We have no context for the photo, no idea of how people are responding, and no reason to impugn these three women for all that is wrong with staged spectator-type worship experiences. I think there is much wrong with contemporary worship, as there has been through the ages in all types of worship--since we are all imperfect sinners.
Posted by: Micah Girl | May 17, 2005 at 05:47 PM
if i shut my eyes and worship, then i won't be looking at what the people on stage are doing. so then it doesn't matter, cause i'm not thinking about them.
it's hard to win. if you do what's in this picture you get criticized. if you don't, you get criticized for other reasons.
how are we supposed to lead anyway?
Posted by: tammy | May 17, 2005 at 07:08 PM
I see essentially a totally self-indulgent spirit in this picture. As a preacher and musician, I search for an expression that allows me to communicate the grace and justice of Jesus -- not something that encourages a focus on self. So, while I must not judge what the singers are experience, my sense is that it isn't what happens when U2 sing "40" or "Beautiful Day" or "Vertigo," right?
Posted by: james | May 17, 2005 at 10:51 PM
'self-indulgent spirit'
and others see the same thing when a man in a expensive suit acts all dignified on the platform.
i wonder how much of what we see is from our backgrounds and prejudices, as opposed to our eyes of the spirit.
i'm guilty too, only in other areas.
if you met these women and had dinner with them -- would you still be so quick to judge?
i really stuggle with this post. and the one before this with the rock concert style of worship.
we are so damn critical!
Posted by: tammy | May 18, 2005 at 04:42 AM
ok Desertpastor,
time for a new one..,
Posted by: Maryellen | May 18, 2005 at 07:01 AM
The disturbing thought is why take such a picture? I feel a bit voyeuristic watching an intimate moment. When I used to attend services like this, I didn't want to focus on the team or the musicians; I wanted to focus internally and upwardly.
Just reminds me, we will do whatever we can to touch the Divine. I just do this sort of thing at home in private rather than publically.
Posted by: Unregulated Female | May 18, 2005 at 02:55 PM
I wonder if any of the ancient Israelites ever wondered such things about the "worshippers" who led the armies into battle and worshipped daily in the temple?
They were on display and were "modeling" worship daily...do you think their sincerety was judged, or did the fear of God prevent this from happening?
Posted by: someone | May 19, 2005 at 12:41 AM
Chris, you are so turning Spencer Burke on us. Starting an onslaught of comments then never coming back to respond.
Posted by: Benjy | May 21, 2005 at 10:47 AM
or maybe he's turning Joe Myers on us -- asking a million questions and then writing a book about it. :D
Posted by: tammy | May 21, 2005 at 03:08 PM
quote: “What do you find affirming or disturbing (or both) about this?”
Hmmh. Interesting question—but why do you ask, and why are you asking any old Tom, Dick and Harry who happens to stumble across your IP address?
If I personally knew the people in the picture, I might be in a position to talk truthfully about what was really going on. But I don’t know the people in the picture.
But I do know from experience that appearances in and of themselves really don’t count for much.
Posted by: Oengus Moonbones | May 21, 2005 at 08:51 PM
Chris,
I agree with by brother Benjy. Ya gotta jump on in here dude...or close it..move on.
This exposes our "real Christianity" here. We Christ followers, we love to fight, judge, gossip, and argue and debate amongst oursevles on many "minor issues" like this one. My smart alec self would say "what a bunch of disfunctional children/family".
It's amazing folks, this is why people don't like the "church".
One of my favorite quotes: "If we are arguing, we are not harvesting!" Let's move on...there's bigger fish to fry...in the end we are all on the same team.
- The Mediator
Posted by: Matt | May 22, 2005 at 09:52 AM
Very interesting responses, everyone.
I find it fascinating, how some of you seem to respond/react very differently to this photo.
Benjy is right about how worship being much more than singing. What I've discovered over the years, however, is that those who are quick to point this out are often the very people who 'resist' musical worship (and the physical expressions that accompany it). I'd personally like to see more 'holistic worship' type people demonstrate a little more consistency between their beliefs and their practices. :D
The post by 'Unregulated Female'has also got me wondering: Is the "intimacy" characteristic often associated with Evangelical worship meant to be pursued 'privately' rather than 'corporately'? When I think of Jesus' teaching concerning public prayer, I think "yes" (i.e. private), but when I think of how individualism has infiltrated our faith, I think "no."
Posted by: Chris | May 22, 2005 at 04:50 PM
Sorry, Chris, but I must respond: individualism must be a part of our faith. If I don't own my own faith, then I am subject to any "wind o' doctrine" blowing hot and heavy. Living out my faith publically is still a private matter between the person and their God. I know personally too many people who make authority their god rather than God their authority.
Posted by: Unregulated Female | June 01, 2005 at 02:35 PM
"individualism must be a part of our faith. If I don't own my own faith, then I am subject to any "wind o' doctrine" blowing hot and heavy."
This may be nothing more than a semantical misunderstanding. Of course our faith must be our own. Sometimes I think of this in terms of our faith needing to embrace individuality without embracing individualism.
"I know personally too many people who make authority their god rather than God their authority."
You're dead-on here. The runaway authority of 'self' is a hallmark of individualism.
Posted by: Chris | June 01, 2005 at 03:13 PM
Wow!... except for the posts that came from a few worshippers of Christ that have been broken, know Him, follow Him and have His perspective on life.....The rest!!What a collection of nonsense.. I am pretty sure the negative comments coming from some of these "supposed" Christians.. Church hop, do not go to church, are submitted to no one, have never fully surrendered thier life to God, have a rebellious spirit, don't have biblical order in thier life, have teenagers who are extremely rebellious and have thrown away their God-ven authority over their live, may have an idea of worhipping God but can only explain it by saying they have "religion".. I think many, many here need Jesus. So that they can be set free from their own mind-prison. Now let me drop a Love Bomb! BOOM!.. Jesus Loves YOU! Still.. in spite of you!! Find Him! Your family needs you too, a generation needs you to! Be blessed...
Posted by: Christopher Paul Wong | November 17, 2005 at 07:37 PM
Many people confuse emotionalism with spirituality. Anyone can be emotional and irrational, but how does one's faith hold up under continuous, draining bad times? Many of the best spiritual writers will tell you that spirituality has nothing to do with emotional display.
Posted by: George Thomas | October 15, 2006 at 11:12 PM