Blog-within-a-Blog

  • Seven Mistakes Every Church Should Avoid
    Whether you agree with any or all of the "mistakes" mentioned in this article, it is certainly worth the read and can serve as a helpful springboard for discussion on the biblical/theological/historical nature of the Church.
  • Why men have stopped singing in church
    A fascinating discussion is unfolding at churchformen.com regarding the disappearance of singing (especially by men) in most churches with a contemporary bent. Although I consider worship to be much more holistic and diverse than what the author is focused on, the discussion there is nonetheless a worthwhile read.
  • The Anglican-Episcopal Divide Widens Further
    NT Wright offers a honest and somewhat heavy-hearted perspective regarding The Episcopal Church (TEC) in the U.S., and their decision to further formalize their decision to appoint to all orders of ministry, persons in active same-sex relationships. This marks a clear break with the rest of the Anglican Communion.
  • "I Am Second"- Incredible Personal Stories
    Personal testimony stories are a dime-a-dozen on the internet. YouTube and a plethora of other sites offer them. But you will NEVER find striking personal stories about life and loss and struggle and victory and faith like you will encounter at www.iamsecond.com. This is a resource site you MUST visit for yourself and then bookmark.
  • Charles Wesley's secret code diary cracked by priest
    An Anglican priest has unlocked the 270-year-old secrets of Charles Wesley's coded diary, throwing light on the turbulent relationship that he had with his brother John in the early years of the Methodist movement they founded... The “hidden” material offers an insight into Wesley's fierce determination to prevent the Methodist societies from breaking away from the Church of England, and disagreements with his more influential older brother.
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 08/2003

Technorati

« Word Cloud | Main | Responsible Mercy »

March 21, 2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"came to start a political, social, religious, artistic, economic, intellectual, and spiritual revolution that would give birth to a new world"

I believe that this casts the question: Is this book about the Gospel Jesus supplied the church, or is it an alien Gospel?

The way I read scripture God destroys the Earth with Fire, Jesus and the holy martyrs destroy The Pseudo-Christ, and death is destroyed. There is a judgement and a resurection. This is done together with the church, but is not done by the church alone.

The left loves the idea of revolution, because that is the origion of the left. But Jesus is no revolutionary, He is the legitimate king provided by God The Father to remove an unwelcome tennant of the Earth, the Devil.

In all the things mentioned above The Holy Spirit wasnt mentioned once, and this shows the disconnect with legitimate Christianity (spiritual by The Holy Spirit) vs. enlightenmnet Christianity (philosophical and humanist). So they change the scripture to read, "By our might, and by our own power, but not by The Spirit, says the Lord". Thus it is revolution, and not by God's Spirit.

As a premise for all left-wing thinking is the idea that there really is no active Holy Spirit, that is: not a living God. And therefore there could be NO Methodist santification.

It's interesting how Gnostic in tone this book is, and even the so called "Secret" things he ends up talking about really aren't that secret (Not if you are serious student of the Gospel, Church History and so forth).


As you might have guessed I have some "issues" with Mclaren....

Gee wiz guys. I don't particularly like or dislike McLaren, but how about reading the book before vilifying it and him?

Love ya both

I'shalom

Seraphim

I am excited about this book. Of course-it is a secret message! I have been in the evangelical church long enough to know that very few members sitting in the pews have any concept of the Kingdom of God. And this is due to the atonement-pop theology that has become common place in the church. I'm grateful Brian is not going to patronize me the way so many evangelical leaders due by dumbing down the message of Jesus. It sounds as if this book will be a good challange to read if he truly engages the ideas of Wright, Wink, Yoder, etc. I'm ired of the same message told over and over again and happy to report Mclaren has become one of my favorite authors due to his fresh and controversial ideas. Brian keep on taking risks, and I'll keep on being challenged and growing in the process.

If I read the book backwards will I get the secret message?

I would read the book, but (as above), I have read a bad review of it.

QUOTE
Gee wiz guys. I don't particularly like or dislike McLaren, but how about reading the book before vilifying it and him?
QUOTE

Well Seraphim I do keep up with Brain. And what I can read or listen to for free I got a problem with. So I'm certainly not going to spend my precious money buying one of his books when it can be spent in a more constructive manner. AKA buying computer games, and taking Gina out! :)

Buy the way why don't you listen to this two part interview and see what you think. You may get some of my drift later...
http://bleedingpurplepodcast.blogspot.com/2006/01/brian-mclaren-interview-part-i.html

"So I'm certainly not going to spend my precious money buying one of his books when it can be spent in a more constructive manner."

Pavel, here's an idea for you: take Gina out for a Starbucks at Barnes & Noble in a couple of weeks, where you can sit down with a copy of McLaren's new book without having to buy it!

Yeah we did that a few weeks back. One of my brothers gave her a star bucks gift card for Christmas that we are slowly using up.


By the way Chris did you listen to the bleeding purple interview and what did you think of it?

I heard what the guy had to say a while back on the link above. I just never bookmarked it.

After hearing him before I can't see why reading him would be fruitful since he seriously doubts that Jesus is divine (he said so). I can tell a shill for socialist unitarian universalism when I hear it. Why not just read "The Last temptation of Christ?"

Heres a good book on the gospels, "Son of Man" by Fr. Alexander Men. Its a great book that does shed light on the Gospels, not try to reinvent it.

By way Chris, Seraphim and others I recommend this ooze thread which discusses the interview I previously mentioned.


http://www.theooze.com/forums/discussions.cfm?forumid=10&topicid=257683&kw=mclaren

by the way here is one chestnut of that interview to encourage you to listen to the interview and read the thread.


"This is one of the huge problems with the traditional understanding of hell...
because if the cross is in line with Jesus teaching then I won't say the only and I certainly won't say the primary but... a primary meaning of the cross is that the Kingdom of God doesn't come like the kingdoms of this world by inflicting violence and coercing people but that the Kingdom of God comes through suffering and willing voluntary sacrifice right? But in an ironic way the doctrine of hell basically says no but that's not really true... again God gets his way through coercion and violence and intimidation and domination... just like every other kingdom does. The cross isn't the center then the cross is almost a distraction and false advertisement for God." -Brian MCLAREN

The comments to this entry are closed.

Desert Pastor

My Photo