photo of Dietrich Bonhoeffer while in prison
As a young German man, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was aware that National Socialism was an attempt to make history happen on its own, without God. He therefore, in 1933 denounced the system that made the Fuhrer its god and idol, and became a leader of the underground confessional church in Germany during World War II. Eventually he became involved in a failed plot to assassinate Hitler as was executed at the concentration camp at Flossenburg on April 9, 1945. Bonhoeffer is perhaps best known for his classic book, The Cost of Discipleship. Within its pages, he describes “cheap grace” as a type of faith that does not necessarily lead to actions, because it does not demand a changed heart. "Cheap grace", he says, means
“grace as a doctrine, a principle, a system. It means forgiveness of sins proclaimed as a general truth, the love of God taught as the Christian conception of God. An intellectual assent to that idea is held to be of itself sufficient to secure remission of sins…Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline…Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate.”
This is NOT a popular topic. We LOVE to talk about grace but get nervous and maybe even offended when the idea of "cheap grace" is introduced. WHY is that? Is it because of the past abuses of "legalism" within the church, or is it because we just can't muster the courage to honestly face the consequences of our sin? Who wouldn't favor the idea of limitless unmerrited favor from God?
But it's hard to discard the perspective and wisdom of believers like Bonhoeffer, whose faith was tested in the fires of persecution and adversity (something few of us can really understand). I often think that our American brand of Christianity has become far too "comfy cozy". Maybe our comfort is driving our theology. Hmmm.
DP -
Just found and catching up with your blog. I have truely enjoyed our conversations recently at theOoze. Thanks.
This reflection about "Cheap Grace" kinda describes my concern as I venture more into an understanding of postmodernism. This is such a shift, and the new paradigm gives quite an explanation to the change in my thinking over the last few years - so that it is very appealing. Yet I still fear that I might be simply looking for an "easy answer" that fits comfortably into my thinking, rather than allowing myself to be challenged by truth (bad word to use when discussing postmodernism, I suspect, but couldn't really find a more appropriate one!). I can send myself spinning in circles with this sometimes...
Posted by: ChristopherRobin | October 23, 2003 at 01:54 PM
ChristopherRobin -- I think you're approaching the whole paradigm shift well, being careful (and willing) to deconstruct the deconstruction (so to speak). The appealing aspect is like a breath of fresh air to many people. It's not uncommon for me to hear people say stuff like: "where has this been all my life!" I'm not sure if that describes you or not, but hang in there and keep "exploring" -- it's an amazing journey!
Posted by: Chris | October 23, 2003 at 11:03 PM
How can grace be anything but free to us and priceless to God? How people use what God freely gives doesn't diminish the gift, rather it produces it's intended affect (freedom, joy and kingdom life) or an excuse to stay in bondage. It's the same with those who use the law for keeping their flock "in line" rather than its intended purpose of showing the dead their need for life. The law isn't cheap...just miss used.
When God prompts me to help someone financially, I expect that whatever they use the money for is between them and God. It doesn't cheapen the gift, my joy in giving or God's joy in my obedience.
I appreciate the B-man's life and plight although to put his suffering up on a pedestal isn't helpful. We all experience testing and persecution, each according to his/her ability to endure.
Hope it's ok to hold an alternative view. Good issue to discuss. Now I'm off to read that interview with the house church pastors :)
Posted by: HeyRick | September 03, 2004 at 09:51 AM
You know, Rick, I've always been fascinated by the paradoxes and enigmas of scripture. "Grace and responsibility" is certainly one of them. I really appreciated the "choice" you pointed out in relation to grace (i.e. resulting in freedom... or bondage). And... of course it's ok to hold an alternative view (about Bonhoeffer, or anything else for that matter). Glad you're reading and posting here!
Posted by: Chris (DesertPastor) | September 03, 2004 at 08:51 PM